Congress leader Rahul Gandhi violated the parliamentary decorum in the Lok Sabha and without the permission of the Lok Sabha Speaker for 2 minutes for the death of the farmers during the protest against the Agricultural Laws. Kept silent
New Delhi: Congress leader and former party president Rahul Gandhi violated parliamentary decorum in Lok Sabha on Thursday. He organized a 2-minute silence for the deaths of farmers during a protest against agricultural laws without the permission of the Lok Sabha Speaker.
Angry Lok Sabha Speaker
Speaker Om Birla got angry after Rahul Gandhi broke the decorum. He said that it is my responsibility to run the house and it should not happen without permission. Om Birla said that it is a violation of rules. If Rahul Gandhi wanted to keep silence then he should have got permission first.
Rahul Gandhi spoke on farmers leaving the budget
During the discussion on the President’s address in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi said, ‘I will not comment on the budget and will not speak on the budget as a demonstration. Today I will speak only on the issue of farmers, the people who have been martyred have not been paid tribute in the House. I will be silent for the farmers for two minutes after the speech. You stand with me After this, the members of Congress took silence.
Walkout on Speaker’s displeasure
After breaking the decree by Rahul Gandhi, Lok Sabha speaker Om Birla expressed his displeasure and said that you have entrusted me with the responsibility of running the house. So let me decide. After this, Rahul Gandhi walked out of the Lok Sabha.
Talk about content and intent of agricultural laws
Earlier, Rahul Gandhi raised PM Modi’s content and statements on agriculture laws. Rahul said that first let’s talk on content and intents. The content of the first law is that any person can buy any number of grains, fruits and vegetables anywhere in the country. If this happens then who will go to the market. The aim of the first law is to abolish the market. After this Rahul Gandhi said, ‘The content of the second law is to promote hoarding by abolishing the Essential Commodities Act. Whereas the content of the third law has not given the right to the farmers to go to court on the issue of right price.
