The Supreme Court has extended the actor’s exemption from surrendering until October 5 while seeking a concrete repayment proposal.
Add informalnewz.com as a Preferred Source
The Supreme Court has granted actor Rajpal Yadav a final two-week opportunity to demonstrate how he plans to settle outstanding dues in a series of cheque-bounce cases involving a private company.
A Bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, directed Yadav to deposit ₹2 crore with the Supreme Court registry and extended his exemption from surrendering until October 5, 2026.
Also Read | Ashneer Grover Questions UPI Merchant Fee Above ₹2,000: ‘End of the Day Consumer Pays’
The court’s latest order came after Yadav’s lawyer sought additional time to present a concrete repayment proposal.
Supreme Court Seeks Concrete Repayment Plan
Senior advocate P.S. Patwalia, appearing for Yadav, requested two weeks to work out a proposal for clearing the outstanding amount.
He told the court that Yadav would deposit ₹2 crore as an indication of his bona fides.
The defence also submitted that the actor had already spent approximately four-and-a-half months in prison and that people from the entertainment industry had helped him secure support during the legal proceedings.
The complainant’s lawyer, senior advocate Ajit Sinha, told the court that the primary concern was recovery of the money, alleging that Yadav had repeatedly failed to honour commitments regarding payment.
The matter has now been listed for October 5.
Court Expresses Concern Over Previous Commitments
During the hearing, the Bench expressed dissatisfaction with Yadav’s previous conduct in relation to payment commitments.
The judges observed that earlier court directions had not been complied with and said his conduct did not inspire confidence.
Despite those concerns, the Supreme Court decided to provide what it described as a last opportunity for the actor to come forward with a concrete proposal.
The latest order therefore gives Yadav a limited window to demonstrate his intention and ability to resolve the financial dispute.
What Is the Cheque-Bounce Case About?
The dispute dates back to financial assistance allegedly provided to Yadav for a film project.
According to the complainant, Murali Projects Private Limited provided approximately ₹5 crore in financial assistance in 2010.
The company alleged that Yadav subsequently issued seven cheques of ₹1.05 crore each towards settlement of the financial liability, but the cheques were dishonoured.
The complainant further stated that an agreement reached in 2012 involved Yadav, his wife and their company agreeing to repay approximately ₹11 crore, including interest.
These are the financial claims underlying the cheque-dishonour proceedings.
Also Read | Ashneer Grover Questions UPI Merchant Fee Above ₹2,000: ‘End of the Day Consumer Pays’
Delhi High Court Had Upheld Yadav’s Conviction
The Supreme Court’s latest proceedings follow a Delhi High Court judgment delivered on July 10, 2026.
The High Court upheld Yadav’s conviction in the seven cheque-dishonour cases and sentenced him to three months’ imprisonment.
The actor and his wife had challenged an earlier decision through revision petitions.
The legal proceedings originated with a magisterial court’s conviction in April 2018, followed by a 2019 sessions court decision upholding the conviction.
The original sentence imposed on Yadav was six months’ imprisonment, which was subsequently reduced to three months.
High Court Refused to Excuse 1,894-Day Delay
The Delhi High Court also dealt with the substantial delay in filing the petitions challenging the conviction.
Yadav had sought condonation of a delay of 1,894 days, equivalent to more than five years.
The High Court declined to condone the delay and directed payments exceeding ₹1 crore to the complainant in each of the seven cases.
The court also noted that approximately ₹2 crore already paid by Yadav would be adjusted against the amount due.
His sentence was kept in abeyance for two months at that stage, allowing him time to approach the appellate court.
What Did the High Court Say About Earlier Payment Undertakings?
In its 108-page judgment, the High Court observed that Yadav had repeatedly failed to honour undertakings concerning payments to Murali Projects Private Limited.
The court said efforts had been made to facilitate an amicable settlement, but according to the judgment, Yadav ultimately declined to make further payments.
The High Court also rejected his request for release on probation and found no defect in the lower court’s sentencing order.
For each case, the court directed that ₹1.04 crore from the fine amount be paid to the complainant, while ₹25,000 would go to the State.
Fine Also Imposed on Rajpal Yadav’s Wife
Rajpal Yadav’s wife, Radha Rajpal Yadav, was also involved in the proceedings.
The High Court ordered her to pay approximately ₹5.5 lakh as a fine in each of the seven cases to the complainant.
The judgment stated that failure to pay the fine could result in three months of simple imprisonment.
Supreme Court’s Earlier September 8 Order
The latest development follows another Supreme Court order issued on September 8.
At that stage, the court issued notice on Yadav’s plea and made his exemption from surrender conditional on depositing ₹5 crore with the Supreme Court registry.
The subsequent hearing has now resulted in the court giving him another two-week window and directing a ₹2 crore deposit as part of the latest proceedings.
Also Read | Ashneer Grover Questions UPI Merchant Fee Above ₹2,000: ‘End of the Day Consumer Pays’
What Happens on October 5?
The next significant date in the case is October 5, 2026.
By then, the Supreme Court is expected to consider Yadav’s proposed repayment arrangement and the amount deposited with the registry.
The court will also assess the next steps concerning his surrender exemption and the underlying financial dispute.
The final outcome will depend on further judicial orders.
The Bottom Line
The Supreme Court has given Rajpal Yadav a final two-week opportunity to present a concrete plan for settling the outstanding amount in the cheque-bounce cases involving Murali Projects Private Limited.
The actor has been directed to deposit ₹2 crore with the Supreme Court registry, while his exemption from surrendering has been extended until October 5.
The case stems from alleged financial assistance for a film project and seven dishonoured cheques. The Delhi High Court previously upheld Yadav’s conviction and three-month sentence.
The Supreme Court’s latest proceedings do not conclude the case; the matter will return before the court on October 5.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Rajpal Yadav facing a cheque-bounce case?
The case concerns seven dishonoured cheques that the complainant says were issued towards repayment of financial assistance connected with a film project.
How much money has the Supreme Court asked Rajpal Yadav to deposit?
The Supreme Court has directed Yadav to deposit ₹2 crore with its registry as part of the latest proceedings.
When will the Supreme Court hear the case again?
The matter has been listed for October 5, 2026.
What sentence did the Delhi High Court uphold?
The Delhi High Court upheld a three-month imprisonment sentence in the seven cheque-dishonour cases.
How much had Rajpal Yadav allegedly agreed to repay?
According to the complainant, a 2012 agreement involved Yadav, his wife and their company agreeing to repay approximately ₹11 crore, including interest.
Is Rajpal Yadav currently required to surrender?
The Supreme Court has extended his exemption from surrendering until October 5, subject to the proceedings and conditions imposed by the court.
Also Read | Ashneer Grover Questions UPI Merchant Fee Above ₹2,000: ‘End of the Day Consumer Pays’
